分享興趣，傳播快樂，增長見聞，留下美好。
親愛的您，
這裡是LearingYard學苑！
今天小編為大家帶來碩士論文《考慮碳補貼和低碳偏好的兩級供應鏈減排策略研究》的考慮消費者低碳偏好的減排模型，
歡迎您的用心訪問！
本期推文閱讀時長大約5分鐘，請您耐心閱讀。
Share interests, spread happiness, increase knowledge, and leave behind beauty.
Dear you,
this is LearningYard Academy!
Today, Xiaobian brings you the emission reduction models that take into account consumers' low carbon preferences for your master's thesis on "A study of two-level supply chain emission reduction strategies considering carbon subsidies and low carbon preferences」，
welcome your visit carefully!
This tweet will take about 5 minutes to read . Please read it patiently.
內容提要
親愛的讀者大家好，今天小編將從思維導圖、精讀內容、知識補充三個板塊為大家帶來碩士論文《考慮碳補貼和低碳偏好的兩級供應鏈減排策略研究》的考慮消費者低碳偏好的減排模型，快來跟隨小編一起學習吧！
Hello dear readers, today I will bring you the emission reduction models that take into account consumers' low carbon preferences for your master's thesis on "A study of two-level supply chain emission reduction strategies considering carbon subsidies and low carbon preferences」 is conducted in three parts: mind map, intensive reading content and knowledge supplement, Come and follow the editor to learn!
正文
01
思維導圖
02
精讀內容
第三章分析的模型是考慮消費者低碳偏好的減排模型，在由一個製造商和一個零售商構成的兩級供應鏈系統中，製造商和零售商減排的方式有兩種，單獨減排和合作減排。通過作者的介紹我們可以了解到，製造商和零售商在單獨減排時雙方均不對對方構成影響，此時雙方的地位平等並且同時對自身的減排量進行決策；當製造商和零售商合作減排時，雙方以減排成本分擔的方式進行合作，因此二者地位不再平等雙方之間存在 Stackelberg博弈，博弈過程由零售商主導、製造商跟隨。合作減排時，零售商依據市場信息先對自身減排量和分擔率進行決策，在了解到零售商的分擔率之後製造商再對減排量進行決策。
The model analysed in Chapter 3 is an emissions reduction model that takes into account consumers' low carbon preferences. In a two-tier supply chain system consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer, there are two ways in which the manufacturer and retailer can reduce emissions: individually and in partnership. The author's introduction shows that when a manufacturer and retailer reduce emissions individually, neither has any influence on the other and both are on an equal footing and make decisions about their own emissions reductions; when a manufacturer and retailer reduce emissions collaboratively, they work together on a cost-sharing basis and are therefore no longer on an equal footing. The game is led by the retailer and followed by the manufacturer. In the case of cooperative emission reduction, the retailer makes a decision on its own emission reduction and its share based on market information, and the manufacturer makes a decision on the amount of emission reduction after learning the retailer's share.
接下來作者介紹了本章模型的基本假設和符號說明。
假設1：製造商（m）和零售商（r）在生產經營的同時都能夠採取減排措施對碳排放進行控制。
假設2：本文所述減排量均為單位產品的碳減排量。
假設3：本文中的消費者屬於價格和碳排放雙敏感型。
假設4：產品的市場需求函數公式
假設5：製造商和零售商的邊際收益是固定不變的。
假設6：製造商和零售商開展減排活動的成本和單位產品的減排量呈二次關係及公式。
The authors next present the basic assumptions and notation of the model in this chapter.
Assumption1: Both the manufacturer (m) and the retailer (r) are able to take measures to reduce their carbon emissions while operating their production.
Assumption2: All emission reductions described in this paper are per unit of product carbon reduction.
Hypothesis3: Consumers in this paper are both price and emission sensitive.
Hypothesis4: The market demand function equation of the product
Assumption5: The marginal revenue of manufacturers and retailers is fixed.
Hypothesis6: The cost of emission reduction activities by manufacturers and retailers and the emission reduction per unit of product are quadratically related and Eq.
03
知識補充
上次我們已經學習了碳中和、碳匯和碳排放權，今天我們接著學習碳交易。
Last time we learned about carbon neutrality, carbon sinks and carbon credits, and today we move on to carbon trading.
第一種情況，如果企業減排成本低於碳交易市場價時，企業會選擇減排，減排產生的份額可以賣出從而獲得盈利；
第二種情況，當企業減排成本高於碳市場價時，會選擇在碳市場上向擁有配額的政府、企業、或其他市場主體進行購買，以完成政府下達的減排量目標。若未足量購買配額以覆蓋其實際排放量則面臨高價罰款。
In the first scenario, if the cost of emission reduction is lower than the market price of carbon trading, the enterprise will choose to reduce emissions and sell its share of the emission reduction to make a profit.
In the second scenario, when the cost of abatement is higher than the market price of carbon, companies will choose to purchase allowances in the carbon market from the government, companies, or other market players that own them in order to meet their government-imposed emission reduction targets. Failure to purchase enough allowances to cover their actual emissions will result in a high penalty.
今天的分享就到這裡了。
如果您對今天的文章有獨特的想法,
歡迎給我們留言，
讓我們相約明天。
祝您今天過得開心快樂！
That's all for today's sharing.
If you have a unique idea for today’s article,
please leave us a message,
and let us meet tomorrow.
I wish you a nice day !
參考資料：Deepl翻譯
參考文獻：劉永超. 考慮碳補貼和低碳偏好的兩級供應鏈減排策略研究[D].鄭州大學,2018.